1.Hangzhou Hygen Health Biotechnology Co., Ltd., 310018, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Scan for full text
Zhou Pingle.Study on virus killing efficiency and related properties of a composite hand & skin antiseptics containing chlorhexidine[J].Sterile Supply,2023,02(01):28-33.
Zhou Pingle.Study on virus killing efficiency and related properties of a composite hand & skin antiseptics containing chlorhexidine[J].Sterile Supply,2023,02(01):28-33. DOI: 10.11910/j.issn.2791-2043.2023.1.04.
Objective,2,To verify the virus killing efficiency, stability and clinical safety of a composite hand & skin antiseptics containing chlorhexidine.,Methods,2,The suspension inactivation test, physical & chemical analysis, accelerated aging study and animal toxicity test were executed to evaluate the virus killing efficiency, stability and clinical safety of the composite hand & skin antiseptics.,Results,2,The composite hand & skin antiseptics containing 0.45 % gluconic acid gluconate, 75 % ethanol and synergists was used for 1 min, the average inactivation of poliovirus type I (PV-I) and EV71 enterovirus in suspension were both >4.00. The sealed package was stored at 37 °C for 3 months, and its active ingredient decline rate was <10%. The composite hand & skin antiseptics is actually non-toxic; it has no micronucleus effect on mouse bone marrow polychromatic red blood cells; it has no irritation to white rabbit in multiple intact skin test.,Conclusion,2,The composite hand & skin antiseptics has a good killing performance on viruses with good stability. It is safe to use for skin and hand disinfection.
Composite hand antisepticsChlorhexidineEthanolvirusInactivation efficiencyStability Clinical safety
ZHONG Y W, ZHANG L, LIU Z, et al. Study on the inactivation efficacy of ethanol and its effect on ultrastructure of poliovirus[J]. Chin J Disinfect, 2019, 36(4): 246-249.
CHEN L Y, ZHOU Y, LIN L W, et al. A comparative study on inactivated effect of two viruses to chlorine disinfectant[J]. Prev Med Tribune, 2014, 20(12): 923-925.
HUANG J G, WU L W, LUO Z H, et al. Detection and analysis of enterovirus EV71 and CoxA16 infection in hand, foot and mouth disease[J]. Exp Lab Med, 2011, 29(3): 328-330.
Georgios Ionidiset al. Development and virucidal activity of a novel alcohol-based hand antiseptics supplemented with urea and citric acid [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2016(16):77.
P.Wutzler and A.Sauerbrei. Virucidal efficacy of a combination of 0.2% peracetic acid and 80%(v/v) ethanol(PAA-ethanol) as a potential hand antiseptics[J]. Journal of Hospital Infection,2000(46):304-308.
LIU H D, LI W M, YUE R L, et al. Preparation of chlorohexidine acetates-silica composite antibacterial materials and their performances[J]. China Powder Sci Technol, 2012, 18(6): 1-5.
LU J L, ZHOU Y L, GUO Y C. Observation on the effect of chlorhexidine acetate bath in the treatment of early neonatal impetigo[J]. J Nurs, 2014, 21(20): 58-59.
XIN X M, ZHANG X R, WANG M H, et al. Discussion on the application of 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate alcohol solution in skin disinfection[J]. J Zhangjiakou Med Collage, 1999(1): 54.
Edmiston CE,Jr Seabrook GR, et al.Comparative of a new and innovative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloth with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate as topical antiseptic for preparation of the skin prior to surgery[J].Am J Infect Control,2007, 35(2): 89-96.
RAO L, WEI Q H, REN Z, et al. Study on influence of acid synergist on viral inactivation effect by triclosan[J]. Chin J Disinfect, 2014, 31(12): 1267-1269.
CHEN L Y, ZHOU Y, LIN L W, et al. A comparative study on inactivated effect of two viruses to chlorine disinfectant[J]. Prev Med Tribune, 2014, 20(12): 923-925.
Thirty years on: HIV receptor gymnastics and the prevention of infection. Weiss RA. Wohl Virion Centre, Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E,
Eckert, DM, Kim, PS. Mechanisms of viral membrane fusion andits inhibition. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001:70, 777-810.
Bosch BJ, Martina BE, Van Der Zee R, et al. Severe acute respi-ratory syndrome coronavirus(SARS-CoV) infection inhibition usingspike protein heptad repeatderived peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A.,2004,101(22):8455-60
Liu S, Xiao G, Chen Y, et al. Interaction between heptad repeat 1and 2 regions in spike protein of SARS-associated coronavirus: im-plications for virus fusogenic mechanism and identification of fusioninhibitors. Lancet 2004,363: 938-947.
Zhu J, Xiao G, Xu Y, Yuan F, et al. Following the rule: forma-tion of the 6-helix bundle of the fusion core from severe acute respi-ratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein and identification of po-tent peptide inhibitors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004,319: 283-288.
Haywood A M.. 1994. Virus receptors:binding,adhesion strengthening,and changes in viral strucrure.J.Virol.,68(1):1-5
0
Views
4
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution