Comparison of cleaning effect of three methods on phacoemulsification silicone tube in ophthalmology

Jinyun Gao; Lijun Cai; Tingting Lin; Yanchan Liu; Xingling Deng

doi:10.11910/j.issn.2791-2043.2024.3.07

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Comparison of cleaning effect of three methods on phacoemulsification silicone tube in ophthalmology

MONOGRAPHIC STUDY | Updated：2024-11-29

- Comparison of cleaning effect of three methods on phacoemulsification silicone tube in ophthalmology
- Sterile Supply Vol. 3, Issue 3, (2024)
- Affiliations：
- Author bio：
  
  Xingling Deng at dxl129@163.com
- Funds：
- DOI：10.11910/j.issn.2791-2043.2024.3.07
  CLC：
- Published：15 October 2024，
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Gao Jinyun,Cai Lijun,Lin Tingting,et al.Comparison of cleaning effect of three methods on phacoemulsification silicone tube in ophthalmology[J].Sterile Supply,2024,03(03):152-155.
DOI：

Gao Jinyun,Cai Lijun,Lin Tingting,et al.Comparison of cleaning effect of three methods on phacoemulsification silicone tube in ophthalmology[J].Sterile Supply,2024,03(03):152-155. DOI： 10.11910/j.issn.2791-2043.2024.3.07.

摘要

Abstract

Objective

The present study aims to observe the cleaning effect of three methods on the phacoemulsification (phaco) silicone tube in ophthalmology.

Methods

A total of 142 phaco silicone tubes taken within 2 hours after surgery were divided in three groups randomly. Manual cleaning was applied in Group A (43 cases)

the method for cleaning and drying devices for batch cleaning of ophthalmic class A lumen was applied in Group B (46 cases)

and the method for cleaning with a negative-pressure vacuum cleaner was applied in Group C (53 cases). The cleaning time was recorded and the cleaning effect was evaluated by three methods

namely

adenosinetriphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay

magnifying glass with light

and air gun.

Results

The qualified rates of manual cleaning

the method for cleaning and drying devices for batch cleaning of ophthalmic class A lumen

and the method for cleaning with a negative-pressure vacuum cleaner were 95.3%

94.3%

and 95.7%

respectively

and the difference was not statistically significant (

0.05). The average cleaning duration was 76 seconds per tube

29.3 seconds per tube

and 69.46 seconds per tube

respectively.

Conclusion

All three cleaning methods are available in the clinic

of which the method for cleaning and drying devices for batch cleaning of ophthalmic class A lumen has the highest efficiency.

关键词

Keywords

OphthalmologyPhaco surgical instrumentsCleaning effect

references

P.Z. Yang and X.Q. Fan, Ophthalmology. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018.

Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Regulation of disinfection technique in healthcare settings: WS/T 367—2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012.

Y. Ma and J. He, “Research progress of toxic anterior segment syndrome,” International Eye Science, vol. 17, pp. 669-672, 2017.

X.L. Deng, J.H. Huang, C.M. Du, et al, “Quality evaluation of manual cleaning of Phaco silicone water pipe in ophthalmology,” Chinese Journal of Disinfection, vol. 34, pp. 1180-1181, 2017.

R. Shen, A.D. Gao, Z.H. Ma, et al, “Study on the application of ATP bioluminescence technology in the cleaning quality monitoring of flexible endoscope,” China Health Standard Management, vol. 13, pp. 182-185, 2022.

Central sterile supply department(CSSD): Part 3: Surveillance standard for cleaning, disinfection and sterilization: WS 310.3—2016[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017.

K.X. Wang and Y.M. Zhu, “Advances in the study on the method detecting the cleaning effect of endoscopic surgical instruments,” China Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 12, pp. 52-54, 2022.

Y.M. Xiao, X.F. Liu, J.P. Zuo, et al, “Influence of bedside pretreatment on cleaning effect of ophthalmic phacoemulsification surgical instruments,” Nursing Practice and Research, vol. 19, pp. 3264-3266, 2022.

G.F. Chen, G.Y. Fang and J.H. Yang, “Clinical analysis of toxic reaction syndrome of anterior segment after cataract surgery,” Modern Medicine and Health Research Electronic Journal, vol. 3, pp. 16-17, 2019.

Views

Downloads

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰